THE TEACHING RESULTS IMPROVEMENT AND RESEARCH WORK STIMULATION VIA GROUP INVESTIGATION METHOD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/miopap.v1i1.343Abstract
The article represents the usefulness and peculiarities of one of the collaborative methods, group investigation method in postgraduate educational programme. The base of the given investigation is to demonstrate the results of the above mentioned method practiced in ASPU. The application of the method has got two main goals: to help the students gain much knowledge in a short time limit via individual research work and develop their research work skills and abilities. The article reveals the main characteristic features of group investigation method, as well as its realization steps and their interpretation.
References
1. D. Jonson, R. Jonson, & Holubec, E. (1998). «Cooperation in the Classroom.» Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon
2. Ivy Geok–Chin Tan, Shlomo Sharan, and Christine Kim–Eng Lee.(2006) GroupInvestigation and Student Learning: An Experiment in Singapore Schools.Marshall Cavendish Academic, 2006.
3. Sahlberg P. (2011). “Finish Lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland?” New York, Teachers College Press.
4. Sahlberg P.(1996) Group Investigation as method of Teaching. Teacher researcher II. Helsinki, p 189–200.
5. Yael Sharan and Shlomo Sharan. Group investigation expands cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 47(4); p. 17–21, 1989
6. Sharan Y., Sharan S. (1992). Expanding cooperative learning through group investigation. New York, Teachers College Press.
7. Sharan Y., Sharan S. (1994). Group Investigation in the Cooperative Classroom. Handbook of
Cooperative Learning Metthods. Praeger, Westport, Connecticut, London, p. 97–114.
8. Zingaro D., (2008). Group Investigation: Theory and Practice. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Ontario,
9. ?. ????????????, ?. ?????????????, ? ???????? (2006). ??????????????? ?????????: ???????: ?????, ???????, 123 ??
10. ?. ??????????, ?. ???????? (2005). ??????????? ????????????? ???????????: 20–?? ???? ??? ?????????? ?????????????: ?????, ????? ?????, 365–386 ??:
2. Ivy Geok–Chin Tan, Shlomo Sharan, and Christine Kim–Eng Lee.(2006) GroupInvestigation and Student Learning: An Experiment in Singapore Schools.Marshall Cavendish Academic, 2006.
3. Sahlberg P. (2011). “Finish Lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland?” New York, Teachers College Press.
4. Sahlberg P.(1996) Group Investigation as method of Teaching. Teacher researcher II. Helsinki, p 189–200.
5. Yael Sharan and Shlomo Sharan. Group investigation expands cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 47(4); p. 17–21, 1989
6. Sharan Y., Sharan S. (1992). Expanding cooperative learning through group investigation. New York, Teachers College Press.
7. Sharan Y., Sharan S. (1994). Group Investigation in the Cooperative Classroom. Handbook of
Cooperative Learning Metthods. Praeger, Westport, Connecticut, London, p. 97–114.
8. Zingaro D., (2008). Group Investigation: Theory and Practice. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Ontario,
9. ?. ????????????, ?. ?????????????, ? ???????? (2006). ??????????????? ?????????: ???????: ?????, ???????, 123 ??
10. ?. ??????????, ?. ???????? (2005). ??????????? ????????????? ???????????: 20–?? ???? ??? ?????????? ?????????????: ?????, ????? ?????, 365–386 ??:
Downloads
Published
2013-04-03
How to Cite
Hohannisyan, A. . (2013). THE TEACHING RESULTS IMPROVEMENT AND RESEARCH WORK STIMULATION VIA GROUP INVESTIGATION METHOD. Main Issues Of Pedagogy And Psychology, 1(1), 35 - 53. https://doi.org/10.24234/miopap.v1i1.343
Issue
Section
Articles
